lawmaking death Forget your comment The Government and the Church dictate norms and behaviors rather than promoting the rights and protections . So you end up launching more monstrous and unenforceable. The natural and the human are used in the name of the supremacy of the Vatican and contingent political majority for the time being. The which legislates and forget the existence of death. How to migrants and refugees, whose right to health is compromised by the new security bill
as it should be now the debate will start again by the Parliamentary Commission of Health of the Senate on living wills. However, it is likely more overpowering than the needs and wishes of people. Effectively, Claudio Magris has reminded us that "The quality of life can be assessed only by the person concerned, the only person authorized to order their own lives and their own death."
E 'should therefore be re-read the full Article. 32 of the Constitution, consists of two paragraphs. The first states that "The Republic health as a fundamental right of individual and collective interest, and guarantees free medical care to the indigent. "No less significant is the second, in the light of recent events:" No one can be forced to a particular health treatment under the provisions of law. The law may in no case violate the limits imposed by respect for the human person ".
principles are based on personal freedom and responsibility of medical and science assets that the state makes available to its citizens to ensure their right to health.
And here lies the great value of secularism and of the inalienable distinction between faith and law. The government and the center-right have embraced with an air of decisions, the position of the Vatican and the Catholic hierarchy, replacing a single blow to the poor will Eluana and his family, to the attention of doctors called to her bedside, the judgments of the judiciary to the contours of the constitutional Head of State.
Yesterday on assisted procreation, today on living wills, and Church Government, storm into people's lives by imposing regulations, establishing obligations, prescribing behavior, instead of helping ensure the rights and protections. With the result that, under the principle that the availability of life belongs to God's will rather than to individuals, the State to determine how the world is and how you leave this earth.
So you end up doing much more monstrous as being unworkable and unenforceable (flights of hope for the English clinics where infertile couples trying to have children has increased by 300% after the approval of Law 40). Or, on the one hand condemning the aggressive treatment of certain abuses and excesses in technology and then you impose them by decree law.
The natural and the human are used, to be vilified in the name of the supremacy of the quota, whether the Church, more and more prone to theocratic terms, that the political majority pro tempore. Which legislates the death and forget about life.
As one linked to the health of migrants, to be reported to the police if they dare to use our health care system. The Church, like any good doctor and nurse any good, denounced the devastating effects of this rule. And some regions (Puglia, Tuscany, Lazio) have already decided not to apply, while center-right government, and seem intent on not to take any account of the findings of ethics-advanced health, faced with such inhumanity from those who are moved by the knowledge that the epidemic hidden from the law, would eventually spill over into the health of the entire population. The revolt of many doctors, Catholics and others, shows how you can be fighting against the side of life the ideological fury of certain legislation.
The fundamentalist crusades based on the affirmation of Christian values \u200b\u200bseem to prevail over freedom of conscience (and treatment) of doctors and citizens. Against any determination of the people, the government has chosen the way that most earthquake awareness and breaks down the barriers of party: pain. Transforming a complex and heartbreaking in yet another clash between where life ends and where early death.
of Giovanni Berlinguer
as it should be now the debate will start again by the Parliamentary Commission of Health of the Senate on living wills. However, it is likely more overpowering than the needs and wishes of people. Effectively, Claudio Magris has reminded us that "The quality of life can be assessed only by the person concerned, the only person authorized to order their own lives and their own death."
E 'should therefore be re-read the full Article. 32 of the Constitution, consists of two paragraphs. The first states that "The Republic health as a fundamental right of individual and collective interest, and guarantees free medical care to the indigent. "No less significant is the second, in the light of recent events:" No one can be forced to a particular health treatment under the provisions of law. The law may in no case violate the limits imposed by respect for the human person ".
principles are based on personal freedom and responsibility of medical and science assets that the state makes available to its citizens to ensure their right to health.
And here lies the great value of secularism and of the inalienable distinction between faith and law. The government and the center-right have embraced with an air of decisions, the position of the Vatican and the Catholic hierarchy, replacing a single blow to the poor will Eluana and his family, to the attention of doctors called to her bedside, the judgments of the judiciary to the contours of the constitutional Head of State.
Yesterday on assisted procreation, today on living wills, and Church Government, storm into people's lives by imposing regulations, establishing obligations, prescribing behavior, instead of helping ensure the rights and protections. With the result that, under the principle that the availability of life belongs to God's will rather than to individuals, the State to determine how the world is and how you leave this earth.
So you end up doing much more monstrous as being unworkable and unenforceable (flights of hope for the English clinics where infertile couples trying to have children has increased by 300% after the approval of Law 40). Or, on the one hand condemning the aggressive treatment of certain abuses and excesses in technology and then you impose them by decree law.
The natural and the human are used, to be vilified in the name of the supremacy of the quota, whether the Church, more and more prone to theocratic terms, that the political majority pro tempore. Which legislates the death and forget about life.
As one linked to the health of migrants, to be reported to the police if they dare to use our health care system. The Church, like any good doctor and nurse any good, denounced the devastating effects of this rule. And some regions (Puglia, Tuscany, Lazio) have already decided not to apply, while center-right government, and seem intent on not to take any account of the findings of ethics-advanced health, faced with such inhumanity from those who are moved by the knowledge that the epidemic hidden from the law, would eventually spill over into the health of the entire population. The revolt of many doctors, Catholics and others, shows how you can be fighting against the side of life the ideological fury of certain legislation.
The fundamentalist crusades based on the affirmation of Christian values \u200b\u200bseem to prevail over freedom of conscience (and treatment) of doctors and citizens. Against any determination of the people, the government has chosen the way that most earthquake awareness and breaks down the barriers of party: pain. Transforming a complex and heartbreaking in yet another clash between where life ends and where early death.
of Giovanni Berlinguer
0 comments:
Post a Comment