Click the image to read the After a long series of complaints by the municipal councilors of the opposition, the judiciary, on August 3 last year, has finally turned spotlight on waste management in the town of Minto.
investigations, for now, have led to the seizure of three areas in which they were found several tons of hazardous waste, ie with a level of danger to humans and the environment very high.
In surveys, in addition to those responsible for "EGO ECO srl", as well as some community leaders are involved because two of these areas are owned by the City of Minto, most of whom, in all these years, has ignored the issue raised by signed with several Board questions and even rejected the amendment to the budget of "Traditions and Values" which aimed at cleaning up illegal dumps.
The incredible thing was that when in August we were the first seizure, the Mayor Pilcher had the courage to declare that he knew nothing and falling from the clouds candidly stated at that time did not have the slightest idea of \u200b\u200bthe conditions in which the landfill Pantano fraught and even less than that in area parks. Yet these areas are owned by the Council that he plans to administer.
Poor thing! Not remotely imagine what is the meaning of the verb to administer.
This behavior, from gall, continued when the City Council published bimonthly by the regime "Minturno News", an article that spoke only in the title of "commitment of the municipal waste management" but that, in essence, was a blatant attempt, in my opinion a worthy example of incomparable ignobiltà moral and ethical degenerate, to divert the attention of the investigating bodies.
I, however, immediately made public, with the publication of certain documents , the "negligence" of Sardelli, who opposed the reclamation of those areas. These documents confirm what is the truth of the facts.
Nevertheless, the continuous Pilcher to ignore the problem and is delighted to make a statement out of place. Friday, in fact, the men of the Guardia di Finanza have returned to seize the Minto area ex ASIA srl "in area parks.
In this case, the Mayor Pilcher said: "It's all in rule, but it is right that the investigations are made ." So far, might as well go with a pinch of salt. He then went on to say, with matchless effrontery, " Too bad if there will be no accountability, no one will be punished or those who have specialized in complaints .
waved no more Pilch because of both the responsibilities, especially his own, there will be all right, since the trickle of illegal acts and the amount of illegal actions spawned from his mismanagement of the res publica.
What can I say?
It seems that the Mayor of Minto that on land owned by the town there are amassed tons and tons of special waste, is a normal thing.
As will be normal for him to donate five hundred thousand euros per year to a company for services never performed, and other two hundred and forty thousand euros per year for a further extension of the service, justified by a strengthening of the media, nothing prohibited by the contract procedure.
will also pay for Pilcher ordinary thing calmly company, which has no DURC in order, failing which he left to be paid to INPS about seven hundred thousand Euro relating to social security contributions not paid to the operators of the ecological construction of Minto , issued three separate orders. What
usual for Mr. Pilcher is also extended for three years a contract, in contravention of the laws and taking a repeated illegal extensions that made up the cost of waste collection service which virtually doubled from unmilionetrecentomila Euro per year for the years 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 to duemilionitrecentomila € for 2005 to reach the Euro duemilionicinquecentomila for the current year.
To give a better idea, it should be noted that the costs for the delivery of waste to landfill are calculated separately for which the total expenditure for the service exceeds tremilionicinquecentomila Euro.
The figures I have written letters to avoid typos. Also, it's just important to remember that the collection last year showed a laughable 1.8% in 2004 when he was reached 5.7%.
That said, I can only send the item back to recovery and rumination published by a prominent local newspaper. Pilcher is in full confusion and is difficult understand the principle of cause and effect.
Someone has to tell him sooner or later, that our complaints are just the effect of his wrongdoing. And since Pilcher has been particularly prolific in the evil deeds in the end we are now, unfortunately, of specialists of complaints "but only to try to contain real" professionals lawlessness. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment